Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2016

Size evolution in microorganisms masks trade-offs predicted by the growth rate hypothesis

Gounand I., Daufresne T., Gravel D., Bouvier C., Bouvier T., Combe M., Gougat-Barbera C., Poly F., Torres-Barcelo C., Mouquet N.

doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2272
Download PDF
Scroll down for preview

Key Message

Adaptation to local resource availability depends on responses in growth rate and nutrient acquisition. The growth rate hypothesis (GRH) suggests that growing fast should impair competitive abilities for phosphorus and nitrogen due to high demand for biosynthesis. However, in microorganisms, size influences both growth and uptake rates, which may mask trade-offs and instead generate a positive relationship between these traits (size hypothesis, SH).

Here, we evolved a gradient of maximum growth rate (mmax) from a single bacterium ancestor to test the relationship among mmax, competitive ability for nutrients and cell size, while controlling for evolutionary history. We found a strong positive correlation between mmax and competitive ability for phosphorus, associated with a trade-off between mmax and cell size: strains selected for high mmax were smaller and better competitors for phosphorus.

Our results strongly support the SH, while the trade-offs expected under GRH were not apparent. Beyond plasticity, unicellular populations can respond rapidly to selection pressure through joint evolution of their size and maximum growth rate. Our study stresses that physiological links between these traits tightly shape the evolution of competitive strategies.

Figure from Gounand et al. 2016
Experimental evolution design (a) and growth curves of strains during experimental evolution (b). Bacteria populations were transferred every 48 h to new medium. Treatments consisted of varying the transfer volume (TV) from 10E-02 to 10E-04 ml, which corresponds to a decreasing number of bacteria transferred (a). These initial differences, though not detectable by optical density, led to delayed growth between treatments after few transfers, here at day 12 as an example (b). Lines represent average values over six evolution replicates (strains) by treatment. Coloured areas represent standard deviation.
Full Article (PDF)