People and Nature · 2025

Danger versus fear: A key to understanding biophobia

Zeller K., Mouquet N., Garcia C., Dezecache G., Maille A., Duboscq J., Morino L., Bonnet X.

doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70009
Download PDF
Scroll down for preview

Key Message

We developed an immersive online survey based on animal images matches, during which participants had to choose the animal they feared most. With responses from 17,353 participants from all continents, we were able to rank 184 species (mammals, reptiles, birds, arthropods and amphibians) on a fear scale.

Our results showed that images of dangerous animals elicited frequent and rapid fear responses. However, danger alone was not sufficient to explain fear, as harmless animals also reached high fear scores. Fear responses varied with participants' age, geographical region of residence and level of declared biophobia.

The discrepancy between actual levels of danger and declared fears in humans may be due to social transmission and increasing disconnection from natural environments. This study highlights the need to consider a wide range of animal species to identify and understand people's fear of certain species, integrating the complex relationship between ecological danger and socio-cultural influences.

Figure from Zeller et al. 2025
Workflow of the Lost in Wilderness online survey and associated analyses. First, participants viewed pairs of animal images (e.g., Neofelis nebulosa vs. Agalychnis callidryas) and selected the one they feared most. Second, they provided personal information. Decision outcomes and response times were analysed using Elo ratings and Bayesian GLMs. Third, participants chose the most frightening animal among eight images (Bitis gabonica, Hipposideros speoris, Lycosidae sp., Panthera tigris, Pithecophaga jefferyi, Mandrillus leucophaeus, Canis rufus, Ursus americanus) and answered questions about their fear. Selection proportions and perceived risks (injury, death, or predation) were then calculated.
Full Article (PDF)